InfoBore 88

Cult of Cyberattack – George Smith, Global Security

Twitter and Iran: First Get the Data, Then Talk – Patrick Philippe Meier, iRevolution

The Cyberwar Plan – Shane Harris, National Journal

Kung Fu Shrine Under AttackPeople’s Daily Online

How Your Brain Sees Virtual You – Ewen Callaway, New Scientist

U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Says Battlefield Success Depends on Technology Developmentdefpro.news

Fort Hood and Social Media: Between Two Extremes – Adam Elkus, Huffington Post

Consumed: The Hype Around Augmented Reality – Rob Walker, New York Times

Email Surveillance: Ditch It For Good – Simon Davies, The Guardian

Words To the WiseCyberSec.eu

GAO: Los Alamos National Lab’s Cybersecurity Lacking – Grant Gross, PC World

Lawmakers Set to Probe Broadband, Privacy, Cybersecurity – Kenneth Corbin, InternetNews.com

CDW-G Issues Federal Cybersecurity ReportTMC News

A Web of Lone Wolves – Evan Kohlmann, Foreign Policy

Introduction: Ubiquitous Human ComputingThe Future of the Internet

Ubiwar Interview With Douglas Crescenzi

Douglas Crescenzi has just published an interview with me at Secure Metaverse and MetaSecurity. Doug posed some challenging questions, to say the least, and I hope the answers I gave don’t betray too badly the serious amount of caffeine I’ve consumed today. Lots of good stuff about cyberspace, conflict, convergence and the like. Cheers, Doug! And ‘cheers’ to you all – I’ll be offline until tomorrow night at the earliest, so have a great Friday night and I’ll catch you on the other side.

InfoBore 87

White Noise Underway

Last week, a House of Lords hearing alerted us to the ‘White Noise’ exercise being conducted this week, in which various UK agencies simulate their response capabilities in the total absence of the public-switched telephone network (PSTN).

The BBC uses the exercise – happening yesterday and today – as a hook on which to hang a story about people dispensing with their landlines totally, something I’ve been wanting to do for ages. It’s a little unclear from the piece whether civil servants are actually having to go without landlines for two days. It seems unlikely, even though that’s the thrust of the article. I don’t really know how these exercises work, to be frank, so if anyone does, please pass on your wisdom.

Jolly Well Knocking Those Nasty Online Terrorists For Six

Chris Williams at The Register picks up on more action from yesterday in the House of Lords – Terrorism Chiefs Don’t Know What They’ve Censored Online:

Police are shutting websites without keeping any records, hampering government efforts to address online extremism, it’s been revealed.

The Terrorism Act 2006 granted powers for police to compel web hosts to shut down websites promoting terrorism. But the powers have never been used, and forces have instead persuaded providers to take down websites voluntarily, according to the security minister Lord West.

He told the Lords on Wednesday that he could not say how many websites have been censored because no records have been kept.

“When we passed the Act in 2006, we laid down a requirement to make such records, but it has not really been done,” he said.

“The Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism is now talking in great detail to the Association of Chief Police Officers, and the requirement will be met. We need to make sure that records are properly kept because we need to have precise facts to work on.”

Well, quite. Evidence-based policy, anyone? Transparent government? Responsibility, compliance, accountability? Not good. Now the inevitable cricket metaphors:

When measures against extremist websites were announced, the government suggested ISPs might introduce filtering arrangements similar to the Internet Watch Foundation’s blocklist of URLs leading to images of child abuse. No system has emerged, however, and industry sources say the idea is not being discussed.

SOCA and GCHQ are both involved in investigating extremism online, and regional police act to shut websites down where possible. However, in common with abuse sites, most extremist sites are hosted overseas.

“A lot of this is abroad — it is carried on by ISPs abroad,” West said.

“We have to deal with them internationally. However, I can assure this House that we are really working hard in this area. We will jolly well get there, and we will jolly well knock them for six finally.

“Finding out who has done something, finding out which server the information is on and where it has come from, is very difficult. It takes very detailed and hard work. I am glad to say that we have some of the best people in the world doing this work, but it is highly complicated.”

Brilliant stuff. I’ve extracted the relevant pages from Hansard as a pdf, as the exchange is a bit long to post here in full.